With a month remaining before President-Elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, tensions are rising in San Diego County as officials debate a key question in the incoming administration’s plans for the “largest deportation” in U.S. history:
What role should local law enforcement play?
At the heart of the debate are “sanctuary” policies – rules protecting undocumented immigrants from deportation by limiting how and when local law enforcement agencies can cooperate with the feds on immigration enforcement. California has a statewide sanctuary law, known as SB 54, or the California Values Act, which generally applies to state and local police and county sheriffs.
The clash between local elected officials attempting to strengthen sanctuary protections, and those trying to degrade them, has thrown San Diego yet again into the national spotlight of the immigration debate.
After the San Diego Board of Supervisors voted last week to further restrict the local law enforcement’s ability to work with the feds, Sheriff Kelly Martinez responded swiftly: She would not be following the county’s new restrictions, though would continue to comply with the restrictions set under state law.
Her defiance was covered extensively by national news outlets.
Weighing in, Tom Homan, Trump’s incoming “border czar,” told the New York Post this week that the county’s new policy was “10 times worse” than other sanctuary laws and suggested that the U.S. attorney would prosecute localities with such policies. Homan also previously threatened to cut federal funding to states with sanctuary policies.
Martinez’s disagreement with the county isn’t the only recent time San Diego has been thrown into the national spotlight on the immigration debate.
The Mayor of El Cajon, who in recent weeks has taken to social media and televised interviews to attack SB 54, also criticized the new county policy, and said he hopes the Trump administration “does something very drastic” in response.
In a previous interview with inewsource, Wells said he was considering violating state lawto aid the Trump administration. The El Cajon City Council voted last week to draft a letter to the California attorney general’s office asking, among other questions, what the consequences will be for jurisdictions that defy the state law.
As the Trump administration seeks to carry out its deportation campaign next month, local enforcement could be caught between conflicting mandates from local, state and federal authorities, said Tom Wong, director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Center at UC San Diego.
Local law enforcement could play a key role in the incoming administration’s promise to deport millions of immigrants living in the U.S. without authorization – a task experts say the federal government is incapable of carrying out alone.
The intensifying political showdown in San Diego offers a glimpse at debates that may soon take shape across the country.“This drama is going to play out as soon as the Trump administration issues its Day 1 executive order on mass deportations,” Wong said.
Local debate heats up
Supporters of sanctuary policies say they’re important because they help foster trust between local law enforcement agencies and undocumented migrants, who could be witnesses to crimes and help with solving and preventing them.
Speaking to county supervisors during a packed public comment session – with more than 100 speakers – supporters also talked about the devastating toll of deportations on families and communities.
State law prohibits local law enforcement from honoring transfer requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, or other federal immigration authorities without a judicial warrant – unless it concerns a person with a prior serious or violent conviction, among other exceptions. If a transfer is not prohibited, the sheriff has discretion to fulfill it or not.
The new county policy requires a judicial warrant for all transfer requests, eliminating the state’s exceptions.
The county policy also prohibits local law enforcement collaboration with the feds generally, unless it’s for investigating a crime unrelated to immigration law.
Opponents of the new policy say it goes too far, arguing that it protects criminals, puts communities in danger and encourages unlawful immigration.
Studies have found that crime rates in cities with sanctuary policies are actually lower than in ones without them, and that the cities tend to be more economically vibrant. What happens when local law enforcement help with immigration enforcement?
Whether the county and Martinez will settle their disagreement over the local policy remains to be seen.
In a statement in response to the policy last week, Martinez said SB 54 already “strikes the right balance between limiting local law enforcement’s cooperation with immigration authorities, ensuring public safety, and building community trust.”
In 2023, the sheriff approved about 18% of the 1,059 information requests from ICE and 25 transfer requests total, including for detainees with convictions for burglary, theft, sale of illicit drugs, assault, sexual abuse, child abuse and murder.
Read the full article on inewsource.org.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( San Diego’s ‘Sanctuary’ Debate Intensifies Under National Spotlight and Trump Admin Scrutiny )
Also on site :
- Pro-EU candidate wins Romanian presidential election rerun
- Popular British TV Star, 47, Debuts Unrecognizable New Look at Cannes Premiere
- WNBA investigating racial slurs by fans made at Angel Reese during Indiana game, AP Source says