When Kamala Harris lost the 2024 US presidential election, progressives around the world did what they do best: blamed each other.
First came the centrist argument. Sure, Harris hadn’t been exceptional. She hadn’t answered the urgent questions of an America exhausted by inequality and declining living standards. She offered no more than Joe Biden. But still: shouldn’t we have held our noses and backed her, just to stop Donald Trump?
The left weren’t having it. Even if disillusioned voters had looked past her timid centrism, her equivocation on the Israel-Gaza conflict and her lack of popular appeal, what would have changed? The Trump wave would still have surged.
Harris’s continuity politics fixed absolutely nothing, they said. Her defeat needed to be a clarifying moment, ending compromise candidates once and for all. If the left ever wants to win again, it needs to offer something radical.
Enter Zohran Mamdani. The 33-year-old democratic socialist just won New York’s Democratic primary, defeating Andrew Cuomo – the scandal-hit former governor backed by millions in corporate money – through a disciplined, grassroots campaign centred on the cost of living, rent, transport, groceries, and childcare. He is now the Democratic candidate for New York City Mayor.
On the surface, it’s an overdue socialist resurgence and a rallying cry for the left. But what truly made Mamdani stand out wasn’t what he said, but the way he said it. He used his platform not to perform, but to explain. He offered thoughtful commentary on the everyday struggles of New Yorkers. In that sense, he has more in common with populists like Donald Trump or Nigel Farage than many on the left would care to admit: speaking directly to voters’ material concerns.
This is where the UK left should be paying sharp attention. Yes, there are some ideological lessons. While Mamdani hardly advocated for full-blown Marxism, he wasn’t afraid of loudly offering leftist solutions. But this was, it turns out, an easy task. Because rent caps, minimum wage increases and hiking corporate taxes aren’t fringe ideas anymore – they’re answers to real problems.
“Every politician says New York is the greatest city in the world, but what good is that if no one can afford to live here?”, he asks in one slick campaign video. Hard to argue with that. His appeal isn’t complicated; in fact, call it common sense.
Labour, by contrast, speaks in bloodless, technocratic terms, all bond markets, fiscal rules, and GDP per capita, while dodging real reform of the tax system, rampant profiteering, and a broken model of privatised utilities. Who cares about economic headroom when a box of cereal, a pack of sanitary towels, and a tub of butter costs more than 10 quid?
Then there’s authenticity. OK, charisma can’t be taught (sorry, Keir), but Mamdani’s appeal wasn’t just charm; it was discipline and a refusal to be everything to everyone.
square HUGO GYE The Labour left has scored its biggest victory yet over Keir Starmer
Read More
He sounded like a person, not a press release. He refused to be dragged into hollow culture wars and identity debates. He stayed on message: equality, fairness, justice. Meanwhile, Labour is so terminally in thrall to irate swing voters that it buries everything under a fog of tepid managerialism. But this triangulation simply doesn’t wash with voters who feel abandoned by Westminster politicians.
There’s a lesson here for the broader left, too. Purity politics is out. Mamdani didn’t win alone. Progressive figures like NYC Comptroller Brad Lander, who once ran against him, swallowed their egos and backed him, recognising that unity mattered in the fight for a better city. It was that shared purpose that helped topple Cuomo’s empire.
Meanwhile, Labour is cracking under the weight of its internal tensions. Starmer’s welfare proposals have sparked open rebellion, and the party is governed with an iron fist. Without internal democracy and compromise, there can be no collective vision, and without that, there will be nothing for the left to unite around.
Mamdani’s win proves the left doesn’t need to dilute its values to succeed; instead, it needs to focus. It’s about sharpening its strategy, clearer language, and grounding policies in the lived experience of ordinary people. His victory is proof that principles and pragmatism can co-exist – a lesson that seems to have evaded the current Labour leadership.
If Starmer wants to survive this term, he should take note: the era of mild, indecisive centrism is over. Voters don’t want managed decline. They’re crying out for a politics with purpose, and a leader who means what they say and dares to act on it.
Zoe Grünewald is a journalist, broadcaster and political commentator
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( New York has a lesson for the Labour left )
Also on site :
- Diego Segui Passes Away
- Mossad thanks CIA for help with Operation Rising Lion
- Egypt vows no power cuts this summer, cites gas supply boost