Six Quarterback Questions That Could Define the 2025 College Football Playoff Chase  ...Middle East

There are college quarterbacks we’ve already seen play, but not enough to know for sure how they’ll impact the national title race. We answer key questions about six of these players. 

The 2025 college football season will present playoff contenders we can’t foresee now.

It will also feature contenders with quarterbacks we have a pretty good idea about already. Carson Beck, if he’s healthy, is a known quantity for the Miami Hurricanes. We have a pretty good handle on who Cade Klubnik is by now, though maybe Clemson offensive coordinator Garrett Riley can conjure a bit more from him in their third year together. 

The College Football Playoff race also has its known QB unknowns. It’s not worth doing the guesswork right now, in May, on who will play quarterback for Georgia, how quickly Julian Sayin will play well at national champion Ohio State, or Bryce Underwood at Michigan, or CJ Carr at Notre Dame.

I wouldn’t even guess who will start the most games for Georgia, and as excited as I am to see baseball-playing quarterback Austin Simmons get some burn at Ole Miss, he’s thrown 32 college passes. (I’ll admit I’m really interested in the sophomore, who led a brilliant drive against Georgia last year and whom I hear good things about from Ole Miss people.) 

There are a handful of quarterbacks in a different bucket, though. These are the players we’ve already seen a lot of, but not enough to know for sure how they’ll affect the title race.

Here are six questions about six of these quarterbacks:

More From Opta Analyst

Which Pitchers Have the Most Strikeouts in MLB History?

The Most Saves in a Season and Career in MLB History

The Longest Playoff Droughts in NBA History

Penn State: Does Drew Allar Have Another Gear? 

Probably not, but I think all of these things are true: 

We understand Allar’s deal after two years as Penn State’s starter. He will keep the ball away from the other team (2.9% pickable pass rate last year, 1.6% in 2023), post decently above-average numbers across the board, and struggle when he meets elite defenses in big games.

The latter is the most subject to change of those realities, though. Allar threw an utterly miserable interception to Notre Dame in the waning seconds of the Orange Bowl semifinal last year, but I wouldn’t bank on him doing that again. Allar wasn’t great in a home loss to Ohio State, either, but he also hit a receiver in the hands in the end zone and saw the ball bounce off those hands and into the grasp of a cornerback for a touchback. 

The margins are small – that’s all I’m saying. It’s nice to imagine Allar will have a proper breakout. I doubt that he will, but don’t fall into the trap of saying, “Penn State can’t win a title with this guy.” They were a play or two away from beating last year’s national champ and a play or two away from getting a rematch with the same Buckeyes team in the title game. (Also, an 11.5% sack per pressure rate is sleek.)  

Texas: Will Arch Manning’s Job Always Be That Easy? 

I’m not exactly being fair to Manning. He drew some tough assignments last year, including entering a game against Georgia down 20-0, cold off the bench. (That didn’t go well.) But in some important ways, Manning had an easy life as a change-of-pace option and backup to Quinn Ewers.

Manning’s open target rate was 87.8%, second-highest in the SEC, as skilled wideouts like Matthew Golden and DeAndre Moore Jr. shook off defensive backs in Steve Sarkisian’s system. The offensive line, with several future NFL players on it, helped Texas surrender a 30.9% pressure rate, the third best in the conference.

Will all of that hold this year? Who knows. Texas recruits at an elite level, but there’s a lot of backfilling to do as Manning slides into the starter’s role.

Left tackle Kelvin Banks and receiver Golden were first-round picks. Quality tight end Gunnar Helm, who developed a lot in Austin, was a fourth-round pick. Guard Hayden Conner went in the sixth. Betting on Texas to fill those holes is fair, but Manning’s growth in his first full-time starting assignment will make everything run much more smoothly. 

Oregon: Will Dante Moore Remain Upright This Time? 

Moore rode the pine behind Dillon Gabriel last season, learning Will Stein’s offense and throwing all of eight passes in mop-up duty. Stein is building a nice little track record of resurrecting transfer quarterbacks who had either gotten pretty stale (Bo Nix) or failed to unlock another level (Gabriel) and were then able to do it with the Ducks.

He’s banking on Moore, in his third year as a college player, being next. 

All we know about Moore, really, is what we saw when he played in nine games as a true freshman for UCLA two years ago. Moore was brutal that year, throwing interceptions on 4.2% of his passes (with a nearly identical 4.0% pickable pass rate) and taking 25 sacks in nine games. (UCLA on the whole gave up 42, placing 119th in the FBS.)

Moore was under constant duress and played like it, posting a 69.9% well-thrown rate that left him in the bottom handful of Pac-12 quarterbacks. 

This is a restart, but issue No. 1 is staying on his feet. Issue No. 2 is not throwing the ball to the other team. It should be easier to accomplish these things in Eugene than it was in Pasadena. 

Alabama: Is Ty Simpson a Completely Different Guy? 

Simpson doesn’t fit perfectly into this collection of quarterback questions because we’ve only seen him sparingly. But he’s appeared in games in three different seasons for Alabama, and I’m intrigued that he’s not only still in Tuscaloosa but looking like the Crimson Tide starter at the moment. 

Simpson’s statistical profile is not much worth digging into, other than to point out that it barely exists. He’s appeared in six games as Alabama’s backup QB in each of the past two seasons, throwing 45 passes over that time. His highest-leverage work was a relief appearance at USF in Week 2 of the 2023 season, when Bama’s offense was stuck in the mud and it looked like Nick Saban had his worst team since 2007.

Simpson only threw nine passes that day, but Alabama reeled off 17 unanswered points, won the game, and eventually made the playoff after settling on a vastly improved Jalen Milroe behind center.  

I don’t think Saban thought that highly of Simpson or he would have gotten a longer look when Alabama was sputtering in the legend’s last season. But, Simpson was a five-star prospect once upon a time, and his numbers are so nondescript in limited action (neither great nor bad) that there’s not much to do but wait and see how this shakes out.

If the season started now, Simpson would be the man. 

Boise State: What is Maddux Madsen Without Ashton Jeanty? 

Madsen was a passenger on Boise State’s journey to the No. 3 seed in the CFP last year. Jeanty was the focal point of Boise’s offense and had a measurable effect on the opposition’s defensive strategy: Boise faced a 49.9% bad box percentage, third-highest in the Group of Five. (On half of the Broncos’ snaps, the defense packed more defenders into the box than Boise had blockers.)

This meant lighter coverage looks for Madsen, and he didn’t do a lot with them. His 77.1% well-thrown rate was just about dead average in the Mountain West, and his 4.69% pickable pass rate was worse than that. 

Madsen still managed solid overall numbers. His 8.1 adjusted yards per attempt were second-best in the MWC behind UNLV’s Hajj-Malik Williams, and his 1.5% actual interception rate was No. 1 among the MWC’s regular starters. But the wide gap between that figure and his pickable pass rate tells us that Madsen was fortunate not to have bigger problems.

To keep the Broncos chugging, he’ll have to play better – and not just without Jeanty, but also while replacing No. 1 receiver Cam Camper.  

Tennessee: Is Joey Aguilar Another Plug-and-Play? 

Tennessee wound up trading quarterbacks with UCLA after Nico Iamaleava headed west. Iamaleava won’t factor into the playoff race at UCLA, but Aguilar could.

The upside here is huge, because the upside is huge for any live-armed quarterback in Josh Heupel’s “run to open grass and wait for the QB to throw the ball really far” offense. But it doesn’t always work, and for every Hendon Hooker (or even Joe Milton) success story, there’s an Iamaleava, who played fine at Tennessee but left a lot of meat on the bone. 

Next up is Aguilar, who was a UCLA QB for just a few minutes after transferring from Appalachian State. Aguilar’s two years starting for App were a mixed bag.

He threw the most interceptions in the FBS last year (14) but may have been a bit unlucky, as his 3.3% pickable pass rate led to a 3.6% real interception rate. (That means Aguilar threw at least one or two picks that our trackers don’t put on him.) Aguilar still had interception problems in 2023, but not as severe, and had pretty efficiency numbers. 

App’s offense under now-fired coach Shawn Clark will never be confused for the Heupel scheme at Tennessee, but Aguilar did have to show some downfield passing chops in Boone. He averaged 10.6 air yards last year (fourth in the Sun Belt) and had an above-average 79.2% well-thrown rate.

He may well be the kind of guy who goes supernova playing for Heupel. You can see the vision!

But let’s wait and see. 

Enjoy the quarterback questions? For more coverage, follow along on social media on Instagram, Bluesky, Facebook and X.

Six Quarterback Questions That Could Define the 2025 College Football Playoff Chase  Opta Analyst.

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Six Quarterback Questions That Could Define the 2025 College Football Playoff Chase  )

Also on site :

• Former Microsoft engineer fired over protest on Israel AI ties
• 'The Office' Star, 45, Wants to Be in Upcoming Spin-Off Series
• Sputnik V creator warns of global ‘cat flu’ pandemic