How the gender self-ID ‘disaster’ could get worse for the SNP ...Middle East

The SNP must drop gender self-identification policies or face “disaster” at the 2026 Scottish election, leader John Swinney has been warned.

The First Minister is facing calls to make clear that the plan pushed by his predecessor Nicola Sturgeon to make self-ID easier for transgender people is now dead.

Swinney has also been urged to overhaul Scottish Government guidance, which has allowed transgender people to self-identify in order to access single sex spaces such as women’s toilets and changing rooms.

Failing to make a clean break with Sturgeon on the issue could prove “hugely dangerous” going into next year’s election, pollsters, political pundits and SNP sources told The i Paper.

It follows the landmark judgement by the Supreme Court, which found that protections for women in the 2010 Equality Act are meant for those born biologically female.

The case initially revolved around a challenge by For Women Scotland against the Scottish Government’s policy of including trans people in gender quotas – but widened to encompass the legal definition of a woman.

Swinney, who recently said he did not regret backing Sturgeon’s self-ID bill, said on Wednesday that he “accepts” the Supreme Court judgement.

However, the First Minister said he would have to take time to consider how it impacts on the public guidance on gender issued by his ministers.

The issue has proved toxic for the SNP ever since Sturgeon passed legislation at Holyrood aimed at making it easier for people to get a gender recognition certificate (GRC) in December 2022.

At the time it was approved by MSPs, a YouGov poll found 66 per cent of Scottish voters opposed the bill. The then-Conservative UK Government blocked the legislation, arguing that it interfered with reserved Westminster powers.

Read Next

Read More

SNP MSP Michelle Thompson, a leading supporter of Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, who made clear she was against the self-ID legislation, told The i Paper that the Swinney Government “must now drop self-ID entirely”.

Thompson also called for a review, not only into gender guidance for public bodies in Scotland, but into the “culture that was allowed to develop that saw the existing rights of women cast aside”.

Thompson warned the party would be out of step with voters if it did not change course. She said polling showed most voters “are concerned about the cost of living crisis and the NHS … not gender ideology”.

SNP MSP Fergus Ewing, another Forbes ally, said Swinney should order NHS and other public bodies to provide women-only changing facilities. “A little humility – and an apology to women – would be the right thing to do,” he added. “That’s what you do when proven to have been wrong.”

A SNP source warned Swinney that failing to change course now would be “disaster” for the SNP – hurting its chances of winning the 2026 Holyrood election and its attempts to revive the Scottish independence cause.

“It’s been very damaging,” they said. “Anyone trying to reintroduce self-ID, either by the front door or the back door, will be in a lonely position.”

They added: “The problem is you can’t get independence without widespread support. It would reduce the chances [of support] if certain groups of people thought this kind of ill-thought-out legislation would be typical in an independent Scotland.”

Swinney’s Sturgeon problem

Prof James Mitchell, Edinburgh University’s professor of public policy, said the Supreme Court verdict had again drawn attention to SNP position being “very much out of step with majority opinion”.

Prof Mitchell said the issue would not “quietly disappear” and would remain a major headache for Swinney.

One challenge was keeping Forbes onside. The SNP leader will be asked for his views on any new gender policies introduced by public bodies and independent services, the expert also warned.

“He faces the dilemma of deciding whether to take sides with Sturgeon and most of the Cabinet, who consist of Sturgeon appointees who remain loyal to her, or with Kate Forbes.”

Andy Maciver, the Scottish Conservative’s former communications chief, said there were some Sturgeon loyalists inside the SNP who “fundamentally” believed in the gender self-ID legislation.

Maciver also said it was unlikely Swinney would ever say he regretted his support for Sturgeon’s self-ID policy – given his recent comments. But the SNP leader can at least change Government guidance and abide by the Supreme Court’s decision, he said.

“It’s clear they [the SNP] have been on the wrong side of political opinion on this, and they’re now on the wrong side of legal opinion,” said Maciver, co-founder of the Message Matters PR consultancy.

“If Swinney was seen to double down on the Sturgeon approach it would be highly dangerous. It would be a political problem going into the election. For that reason, I don’t he will [double down on the Sturgeon approach].”

Pollster Mark Diffley, founder of The Diffley Partnership, added: “There are dangers for John Swinney if he doubles down [on gender self-ID].

“He will be trying to keep this issue out of the election, because there is no good outcome for them on it.”

Diffley said independence polling was so stable – with roughly 50 per cent of Scottish voters in favour and 50 per cent against it – that gender reform policy was not likely to change any views. “Even if it causes the SNP difficulty, I don’t see it having a direct impact [on independence support].”

Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry called on Sturgeon to apologise for her stance. She also urged Swinney to “step up to the plate” and make sure guidance across the public sector was “re-written”.

Writing for The i Paper, the Scottish Greens activist Ellie Gomersall, a trans woman, said she was “deeply worried” by the judgment from the Supreme Court.

Helen Belcher, chair of TransActual, called on Swinney to appeal the “clearly biased ruling”, and urged both UK and Scottish Government to develop a whole new approach to equalities law.

SNP Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the Scottish government “no intention of bringing that [self-ID legislation] back”. She suggested the Scottish Government would wait for the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) to develop new, UK-wide guidance before making any changes.

However, the Equality and Human Rights Commission has said it would not offer its own updated guidance for all services, including NHS and prisons, until the summer.

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( How the gender self-ID ‘disaster’ could get worse for the SNP )

Also on site :

• Country Star Reveals He Soiled Himself Onstage in Major 'TMI' Moment
• ‘He’s got MS-13 tattooed onto his knuckles’: Trump appears to hold up photoshopped image of Abrego Garcia’s hand
• 'Fire Country' Star Stephanie Arcila Goes Inside Gabriela’s Stalker Storyline (Exclusive)