The recent decision by New York Judge Juan Merchan to reject Donald Trump's request to pause sentencing in the hush money case marks a significant moment in the ongoing legal battles faced by the former president. The judge's ruling, which maintains that arguments regarding presidential immunity are unwarranted and repetitive, underscores a broader judicial sentiment that prioritizes the resolution of legal matters over political considerations . This decision not only reaffirms the autonomy of the judiciary but also reflects an adherence to procedural integrity within a politically charged environment.
The filing came as Judge Merchan denied a request by Trump, filed earlier Monday, that Merchan stay the sentencing, which is scheduled for Friday.
Trump's lawyers filed the lawsuit -- called an Article 78 motion -- in New York's Appellate Division First Department.
Trump's attorneys argued in the suit that Judge Merchan exceeded his jurisdiction when he denied Trump's claim of presidential immunity in his ruling last week and ordered Trump to appear for sentencing, either in person or virtually, on Jan. 10 following his May conviction.
The judge said Trump, 78, may appear at his sentencing either in person or virtually.
In their Monday filing, Trump lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil Bove asked Merchan to hold off sentencing Trump while the appeals play out. Any delay would make it unlikely that Trump would be sentenced before his Jan. 20 inauguration.
A Republican, Trump has long argued that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, brought the case to harm his reelection campaign. Bragg has said that his office routinely brings felony falsification of business records charges - the charge Trump faced in the case.
In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Trump declared that his legal team was moving “to stop the unlawful sentencing in the Manhattan D.A.’s Witch Hunt.” The spokesman, Steven Cheung, added that: “The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity, the state constitution of New York, and other established legal precedent mandate that this meritless hoax be immediately dismissed.”
Judge Merchan's determination to proceed with sentencing, scheduled for January 10th, emphasizes the necessity of closing this chapter in light of Trump's impending inauguration. While there was an indication from the Manhattan District Attorney's office regarding potential leniency in delaying sentencing until after Trump's term, Judge Merchan concluded that addressing these legal issues promptly is essential. This approach aligns with judicial principles that seek to uphold accountability regardless of an individual's political status or aspirations.
Furthermore, while Trump's legal team has indicated plans to appeal his conviction, it remains clear that Judge Merchan is prepared to deliver what he has signaled could be an unconditional discharge—a ruling that would result in no jail time despite felony convictions. This outcome illustrates a complex interplay between justice and politics, suggesting that while Trump may evade prison time for now, he will still face significant ramifications stemming from his actions. Ultimately, this case serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of upholding rule-of-law principles even amidst high-profile political controversies.
Read more
AC Milan 3-2 win over Inter in Italian Super Cup final China steps up monitoring amid new virus outbreak, what to know about HMPVSarah H
Also on site :
- Chelsea Women cruise past Crystal Palace 4-0, closing in on WSL title
- Learn about Centennial Area Health Education Center’s work at Friday’s ‘AHEC of a Party’
- Leganes vs. Girona - prediction, live broadcast , lineups