Scientists revive 48,500 year-old virus

scientists revive 48 500 year old virus

Pressbee - Russia Today :

Watch the post from Scientists revive 48,500 year-old virus, Now to the details :

An international team of researchers has brought back to life what they believe is the most ancient virus ever resuscitated
The melting permafrost may pose a danger to humanity, scientists have warned after reviving an ancient virus, which lay frozen for tens of thousands of years. Such viruses are still capable of infecting living organisms, the international team said after they observed a total of nine ancient viruses discovered in the Siberian permafrost infecting amoebas in a lab. The most ancient of the newly discovered viruses is almost 50,000-years-old, the team said. “48,500 years is a world record,” Jean

For more, read the news from the source

Scientists revive 48,500 year-old virus

This was the summery for Scientists revive 48,500 year-old virus We hope that we have succeeded by sharing the full details of this topic.

Russia Today Scientists revive 48,500 year-old virus An international team of researchers has brought back to life what they believe is the most ancient virus ever resuscitatedThe melting permafrost may pose a danger to humanity, scientists have warned after reviving an ancient virus, which lay frozen for tens of thousands of years. Such viruses are still capable of infecting living organisms, the international team said after they observed a total of nine ancient viruses discovered in the Siberian permafrost infecting amoebas in a lab. The most ancient of the newly discovered viruses is almost 50,000-years-old, the team said. “48,500 years is a world record,” Jean

Please note that the original topic has been published and is available on Russia Today the editing team at PressBee have verified it and it may have been partially modified or quoted from it. You can read and follow this news or topic from its main source.

( PRESSBEE ) An independent news reader does not assume any liability for the material published in it because it does not express the opinion of the site.