This time around, the administration wants to be far more aggressive. The Washington Post reported earlier this month that, in internal conversations, Trump officials hope to deport at least one million people from the United States in their first year in office. This may sound feasible on paper since there are at least 1.4 million undocumented immigrants currently in the country who have received final deportation orders from immigration courts, meaning that they can be lawfully removed as soon as they are taken into custody.
While the Trump administration is earnestly trying to remove as many immigrants from the country as it can, there is also a highly performative nature to its second-term strategy. It is not enough to cite year-to-year removal statistics from federal databases; the Trump administration wants to be seen arresting immigrants, jailing immigrants, and deporting immigrants.
Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem has also gone on multiple highly publicized raids with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents, often in the same gear that they wear. In at least one instance, she brought along a right-wing influencer to promote them. The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month that some ICE officials were “rankled” by her presence at a raid in New York City, one that apprehended fewer immigrants than its planners had hoped. It nonetheless served the goal of making the administration’s tactics as visible as possible.
In sanctuary cities and states, where officials have avoided helping immigration officials for public safety reasons, Trump signed an executive order on Inauguration Day that instructed the attorney general and the secretary of homeland security to “evaluate and undertake any other lawful actions, criminal or civil, that they deem warranted based on any such jurisdiction’s practices that interfere with the enforcement of federal law.” It also directed them to ensure that “so-called ‘sanctuary’ jurisdictions” do not receive federal funds “to the maximum extent possible under law.”
What the “criminal” aspect means could be far more sinister. Last December, a pro-Trump legal organization led by Stephen Miller, his top domestic adviser and an avowed opponent of immigration, warned more than 200 elected officials in California that they could face federal criminal charges for their sanctuary policies. In a letter to San Diego County officials, for example, the group claimed that officials could face charges ranging from obstruction and conspiracy to illegally harboring aliens.
Sebastian Gorka, the White House senior director for counterterrorism, also recently suggested that the administration might bring criminal charges against Democrats who pushed for El Salvador to release and return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man deported in error by the Trump administration last month. “You have to ask yourself, are they technically aiding and abetting them, because aiding and abetting criminals and terrorists is a crime,” he claimed in a Newsmax interview last week.
Trump and his allies often insist they have a democratic mandate to carry out their agenda. So do state, local, and federal elected officials who resist them. Prosecuting the people’s representatives for policy disputes would be a severe blow to American democracy. If nothing else, the Trump administration’s goal is apparently to induce a chilling effect on state and local leaders who might resist its sweeping immigration priorities.
“Is that impeding our law enforcement efforts?” he said in an interview shortly after the webinar. “And if so, what are we going to do about it? Is she crossing the line? So, I’m working with the Department of Justice and finding out. Where is that line that they cross? So maybe AOC’s gonna be in trouble now.”
Ordinary American citizens are also feeling pressure from immigration officials for helping immigrants. Investigative journalist Radley Balko reported earlier this week about a lawyer in Texas who was asked for legal help by an immigrant family. Two days after he spoke with them, two men in civilian clothes—who never identified which, if any, law enforcement agency they worked for—knocked on the lawyer’s front door and questioned him about his assistance. The lawyer’s internet access briefly went offline while the agents were present, and they refused to give him their names or badge numbers. (As the lawyer told Balko, the suspicious timing of his internet outage ensured that the Ring camera on his front door could not capture the exchange.)
What also stands out to me is not only the authoritarian tendencies but the timing. The second Trump administration is barely one hundred days old. This is supposed to be the president’s honeymoon phase after an election. Presidents are never more popular or more influential than they are at this point in their terms. Trump’s public approval ratings are only now starting to dip to their lows. The economy will likely run aground in the next few months once the full force of his tariffs is felt, but it hasn’t done so yet.
If this is the administration’s baseline behavior, what will happen when something actually goes wrong? Every presidency comes with major disasters, international crises, and internal scandals. What happens when immigration officials fall short of their lofty aspirations for deportations—a near-certainty given the natural constraints of ICE’s current manpower, the administrative and procedural hurdles it faces, and the challenge of finding other countries willing to take them. Trumpworld’s authoritarian actions so far signal that its critics and opponents will be the ones who pay the price.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Trump’s War on Immigrants Has Become an Attack on Us All )
Also on site :