Eli J Finkel, a social psychologist, said: “It is a lot to expect your partner to be the co-chief executive of the household, to split childcare, to be your exclusive sexual companion and to be your best friend.” Dr Alexandra Solomon, a clinical psychologist, felt that “liking your partner” — which she described as “admiring them, finding them funny, caring about their worldview, and having fun simply being together” is what’s needed for a solid relationship. And Professor Adam Fisher, the president of the American Psychological Association no less, argued that, “couples need some kind of ‘glue’ — commitment, shared values, sex, finances — something”, but it doesn’t need to be friendship.
Seriously, what are you doing? Why in the name of all things holy would you voluntarily share your life, in the most intimate way, with anyone who wasn’t your most favourite person on the planet? Because you “share values”? That is complete madness. If there is someone you like more than your partner, someone else that you call your BFF, then you should move in with them, immediately. Stop titting about and wasting your time with the runner-up.
I love being single, which only makes the revelation that there are people out there, who are coupled up with someone who isn’t their best friend and best person, utterly baffling. Surely, a romantic relationship is the most intimate and significant set up two (or more) people can embark on? Why would anyone choose to do this with someone who wasn’t their best friend?
Gentle parent your children away from me, please
Read MoreUntil very recently in our shared history, marriage was an economic necessity, especially for women. My grandmother was paid a fraction of the wage a man was earning for doing the same work and was barred from entering certain professions. Go back a bit further and women couldn’t go to university, or vote, or keep her own money once she was married. Without a husband to support her, a woman’s prospects were bleak indeed. So yes, women needed to get married until quite recently in our history. Being best friends with your partner didn’t really come into it. Hell, I’m not even sure if it was all that important if you even liked each other.
Surely, the only and obvious answer to that is because your significant other is the person you like more than any other? That they make your life better by being in it? There are still a lot of financial advantages to being in a couple. Take it from a committed singleton, solo living isn’t cheap, but you don’t need to jump into a romantic relationship just to offset the cost of the lecky bill. You can flat share or live in a commune.
There is an important point I feel that The New York Times article neglects: it’s not that your partner shouldn’t be your best friend, but rather they shouldn’t be your only friend. I see this dynamic a lot, especially amongst older women who have retired alongside their husbands, only to discover that he now follows her around the house like a lonely duckling because he has no friends of his own.
If you ask me, the key to a healthy relationship is having loads of other people in your life that you can turn to when that person is absolutely doing your head in, which they inevitably will. But, having a vibrant and varied friendship group does not mean that the person you choose to spend your life with shouldn’t be at the top of that list.
Otherwise, what is the point?
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( If your partner isn’t your best friend, dump them now )
Also on site :