tax bill, unresolved issues such as the State and Local Tax (SALT) deductions remain contentious. The urgency surrounding these revisions is heightened by an ambitious goal of enacting the legislation by July 4, which underscores the GOP's commitment to advancing its economic agenda amidst internal disagreements.
Hours after unveiling central tenets of the Senate GOP’s measure, at least one GOP senator – conservative Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin – said he is currently opposed to the bill, saying it doesn’t do enough to control US spending. He added there’s “no way” the bill can be fixed in time to pass by July 4.
“Not by July 4th. No way. We haven’t had the discussions we need,” Johnson said.
Josh Hawley of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine.
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., has been critical of that idea, saying it could hurt rural hospitals in his state. “That’s not good,” he said when asked about the Senate provision. “It sounds to me like this needs some work.”
In a major challenge to House Republicans, the Senate bill caps federal deductions for state and local taxes at $10,000 per tax filer, preserving the status quo on “SALT.”
That’s much lower than the $40,000 limit per filers with annual incomes under $500,000 that a key group of blue-state Republicans secured in the House version, after making clear it is essential to winning their vote in the narrowly divided chamber.
Key Republican senators are advocating for significant changes to the House-passed version of the bill, particularly concerning Medicaid provisions and concerns about increasing national debt . This divergence reflects broader ideological splits within the party regarding fiscal responsibility and government spending. Furthermore, discussions around making certain tax provisions permanent—specifically in areas like Research and Development (R&D) expensing—highlight another layer of complexity in negotiations. Senators Crapo and Daines are pushing for full R&D expensing contrary to the House's proposal for a limited five-year window .
The Senate’s reworking of this pivotal legislation not only illustrates intra-party tensions but also emphasizes how these financial policies will shape future economic landscapes. With deadlines looming and differing priorities between chambers, stakeholders must navigate this intricate legislative environment carefully. Ultimately, how these debates unfold will have lasting implications on both fiscal policy and party dynamics moving forward.
Read more
$230K in Sight? Experts Recalculate Bitcoin’s Real Value USMNT win 5-0 over Trinidad and Tobago, Gold Cup group stage
Sara H
Also on site :