Question: Why is the unfair money purchase annual allowance (MPAA) allowed to exist? A friend had a £50,000 defined contribution pension which he had to liquidate during Covid. I had a defined benefit pension which was significantly larger but did not exceed the old £1m lifetime allowance. We both went back to work after Covid “retirement” and earn over £100,000. I can put up to £60,000 into my pension out of current earnings. My friend earns the same but is limited to £10,000 MPAA and he needs the pension more. Why hasn’t this unfairness been addressed?
square SAVING AND BANKING How to decide which ISA account is right for you
Read More
For each year you are in the scheme, you will build up or “accrue” an entitlement to a proportion of your average or final salary. For example, someone who is a member of a 1/60ths career average scheme for 30 years will be entitled to 30/60ths, or half, their average salary as a guaranteed, inflation-protected income from their normal retirement age.
To keep the cost of providing tax relief on pension contributions under control, there are limits on the amount you can contribute each tax year while receiving tax relief. First, there is an overall “annual allowance” set at £60,000, covering employer contributions, personal contributions and tax relief. Second, the maximum you can personally contribute to a pension (inclusive of tax relief) each tax year is limited to 100 per cent of your earnings.
Additionally, if you “flexibly access” taxable income from a DC pension, as your friend has done, the “money purchase annual allowance”, or MPAA, is triggered, lowering your annual allowance from £60,000 to £10,000.
The MPAA doesn’t apply where someone just takes their tax-free cash, accesses a DB income or buys an annuity (a guaranteed income for life paid for by an insurance company). In addition, it is possible to take up to three “small pot lump sums” worth £10,000 from personal pensions – and an unlimited number from occupational DC pensions – without triggering the MPAA. To qualify as a small pot lump sum, the withdrawal has to extinguish the entire pot.
In terms of why the MPAA exists, the logic behind the allowance is that it prevents people excessively recycling their pensions in order to generate extra tax-free cash. While there are specific rules around recycling, the government felt the extra protection of the MPAA was necessary to mitigate this risk to the Exchequer when the “pension freedoms” reforms were introduced almost a decade ago.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( My friend is having his pension saving limited after ‘unretiring’. How is it fair? )
Also on site :